23. white. woman. cis. estonian. awkward. a bit of an introvert.
i'm all about music and books: my last.fm and my goodreads
my others blogs: style/beauty and books
the constant framing of japan as a land of weird and wtfery is in fact a form of orientalism
Also, an absolutely ENORMOUS chunk of Japanese wtfery… is a product of white colonialism.
(via rubato)
no really though
all you white assholes (usually cis-women in this context) are really willing to take pieces of my culture and wear it because it’s pretty or some bastardized spiritual significance. you’re willing to trumpet your freedom of speech and religious expression and how it’s your “right” (yes, being a massive douche is a right, i’ll give you that) to wear it, no matter what the people who ACTUALLY HAVE A CONNECTION TO IT say
but you’re so fucking complicit in the dehumanization of my body through fetishization and exotification. you’re complicit in the sexual and physical violence against women like me, in the third world savior complex, islamophobia, etc
because when you continue to wear all these things we poc tell you not to wear, you’re telling us (again) that our voices don’t matter when it comes to our own cultures and religion
you’re telling us to butt out of a conversation that involves us to the very core of who we are
you’re telling us that your whiteness, fashion sense, and third-eye wikipedia bullshit is more important on every level than you respecting me and my very basic humanity
in fact, you’re straight up stripping me of my humanity and telling me i don’t count
i never will
not when faced with your love of color, the exotic, and continued dehumanization people of color to animals squawking in the background versus people you respect
fuck. off.
(via karnythia)
Migrant Deaths Highlights Problem with Illegal Immigration in Turkey, Greece
700,000 people tried to cross through Turkey in the course of 12 years. I think it is time we stop enabling the current framework in the European Union that addresses all cases of undocumented migration as “asylum seekers” or “refugees”. This is not merely the result of political and or war related struggles. This is also inherently connected to poverty, the rule of corporations, centuries of colonial interventions and the depletion of resources, the imposition of institutions like the World Bank and the IMF and the economic measures that only bring poverty and decimate communities.
The EU presents the issue in an hegemonic manner (i.e. everyone trying to reach the continent is a “refugee” or an “asylum seeker”), avoiding to address this situation for what it is: a humanitarian catastrophe borne out of centuries of exploitation by the very same structures of power that now criminalize these people.
Every undocumented migrant is a political immigrant. Just because the EU refuses to acknowledge it doesn’t make it less so.
(via redlightpolitics)[…]
The jewel is currently mounted in the crown of the Queen Consort, last worn by the late Queen Mother.
The family is also seeking the return of Maharaja Ranjit Singh’s golden throne and for both to be kept at the Golden Temple, the centre of the Sikh faith, in Amrtisar, India.
Their case reopens a controversial chapter in British colonial history that still arouses strong passions in India, particularly in Punjab, where Sikhs regard the exile of Duleep Singh and his “gift” of the Koh-i-Noor diamond to Queen Victoria in 1850 as a national humiliation.
“Our property was confiscated by British rule. This letter establishes us as the rightful heirs of Duleep Singh and we want to get back his remains and his other belongings to the Golden Temple,” Jaswinder Singh Sandhanwalia told The Daily Telegraph on Sunday.
More power to the Singh family for taking back what belongs to them. Kicking imperialism and colonialism’s collective rear end with Indian might and right.
GOOD I HOPE THEY TAKE EVERYTHING THE BRITS STOLE
TAKE IT ALL
(via karnythia)
No, Dominic. You mean it was a rotting pit of human rights violations, intolerance, slavery, censorship, land theft, unmarked graves for natives, sodomy against slaves, interrogation that involved mutilating bodies for extraction of information, dragging people behind Land Rovers, more brutality, systematic erasure of histories and identities, and a whole lot more.
I don’t see an inkling of tolerance, decency in a rule of law that was oppressive, racist, expansionist-based and, most importantly, illegal. I am just amazed to know that this man and Ferguson and others like them are still regarded as “authentic historians” in the US and the UK.
(via mehreenkasana)
Fucking dumbass. Tell that to my grandfather who was hunted down by the British and even shot and jailed for protesting against the British occupation of Mother India.
(via deafmuslimpunx)
Hey you know who directly contributes to the genocide in Tamils because of colonialism? THE BRITISH EMPIRE. Stfu forever.
(via howshinisterofme)
(via biyuti)
one thing i like to do from time to time is to read the writings of white aetheists
then apply what they’re saying to African/diasporic religion and watch their arguments get shot to shit
It’s one of the things that never ceases to amaze me about those types of people: they position religion as this totalizing universal force but never stop to question the fact their entire ideology is composed via a universalism that ironically has it’s roots in the Christian church. i.e. their ideology is composed the same way as they represent religion.
I really can’t see Eurocentric atheists as anything but colonialists and missionaries. They’re post-Christian, but the ideology is otherwise unchanged.
^^^ and they ignore that many of the negative things they decry about Christianity came about because Christianity was used as a tool of enslavement, colonization, genocide etc.
zuky:
The (First) Opium War (1839–42) Qing dynasty
China at this time, had many important trading products that European countries needed such as china, silk and tea but Europe in the other hand, only had silver that Chinese people were interested in. The British wanted to increase the cooperation and trading with China and come up with an idea; to illegally export opium to China. The Chinese government tried to stop the trading but the consumption of opium had already started and the consumption also grew rapidly among the citizens which became a very uneasy problem to solve, a total of 36353 coffins were exported from the United Kingdom to China.
Great Britain made demands for the trading but a war broke out when China didn’t accept the conditions. China lost the war and a preliminary treaty was created; to hand over Hong Kong to Great Britain, pay 6 million dollars to Britain and also opening the trading port of Guangzhou. However, none of the countries accepted the terms of condition and the war didn’t come to an end. In august 1842, U.K had occupied Nanjing and China was forced to make peace and accepting the demands.
1. Open up 4 more ports for every nation and foreign merchants are allowed to live and build in the 5 cities with open ports.
2. Britain was going to obtain Hong Kong.
3.China should pay for the British costs of the war, which was 21 million dollars.
(The photo was taken right after the war, the amount of drug-addicts was around 2 million in China)
This is a piece of history everyone needs to understand in order to understand the current shape of the world, and that’s a great historical photo, but I’m never satisfied with these little write-ups on tumblr. Probably because my standards are unrealistically high, coming from a family in which Chinese history was the regular topic of kitchen table conversation throughout my childhood.
Basically, Once Upon A Time In China (well, just a short time ago in the 19th century), the Qing dynasty was in its death throes: imperial corruption had been eating away at society for a century, so that widespread crushing poverty gripped the masses while the elite lounged and slumbered in extreme opulence.
So arrogant and corrupt were the Manchu rulers that they allowed China to be carved up by European colonialists right under their noses. Different colonial powers took bites out of China called “spheres of influence” with full extraterritoriality (i.e. no need for colonizers to obey the laws of China, only the laws of their countries of origin) and trading laws which amounted to the pillaging and plundering of China.
Despite all that, Europeans wanted more. In particular, Great Britain wanted more tea for less, so they came up with the plan of shipping opium into China. Like the US crack epidemic, China was a ripe target for such a strategy. Many desperate, impoverished people hit the opium pipe and an already-weakened country was further weakened. The US began shipping Turkish opium to China in the 1820s.
Under tremendous domestic pressure and real threats of revolt, the Qing dynasty was forced into action: they attempted to stop the flow of opium into China by force. In a pivotal incident in 1838, a famous Qing commissioner dumped 20,000 chests of opium from a British ship into the sea in Guangzhou. At that point, I wouldn’t say that war “broke out”; I would say that Britain attacked.
The Qing dynasty had never shown any interest in developing naval power, but they did have canons along the coast. However, the British gun-boats had bigger canons with longer range. What happened was that the British were able to bomb the coast of China with impunity while remaining out of range of Chinese canons. With no choice in the matter other than total destruction, the Qing court conceded to Britain’s demands, handing over Hong Kong, opening up to even deeper plunder, and beginning a series of Unequal Treaties. The Qing dynasty was overthrown in 1911 and the period of the Opium Wars is now known in China as “the Century of National Humiliation”.
That’s what you need to know about the Opium Wars. That’s why Hong Kong remained under British rule until 1997. That’s why China is fucking sensitive about European and North American demands and interference. That’s why Mao Zedong became such a huge hero to the Chinese people: he defeated the colonialists and kicked them out. This history continues to underlie relations between China and the West.
(via karnythia)
(via hamburgerjack)
Before calling Africa a “Third-World” continent, think again.
It’s due to western imperialism and capitalism that strangled Africa.
Why do you think white people can’t keep their hands off of it.
ultimately Africa is called a third world country (even though its a continent) to justify white colonialism and invasion of the land in order to “civilize” and provide “resources” and “freedom” all while Africa is raped and pillaged. literally and figuratively.
whb2:
The Namibia Genocide the first genocide of the 20th century Horrifying Secrets of Germany’s Earliest Holocaust
*This should be taught in school
When you hear of Death Camps and Genocide, Nazi Germany and world war two come to mind. But Germany had practiced it’s murderous craft over sixty years before WWll. Before the Armenian Genocide, before the Jewish Genocide over 150,000 Herero and Nama peoples of modern-day Namibia were murdered by the order of Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany between 1904 and 1909.
Along the coastline of Namibia runs the Namib desert, a 1,200 mile long strip of unwelcoming sand dunes and barren rock. Behind it is the central mountain plateau, and east of that the Kalahari desert. Namibia’s scarcest commodity is water: this is a country of little rainfall, and the rivers don’t always run. But the very sand of the Skeleton Coast is the dust of gemstones; uranium, tin and tungsten can be mined in the central Namib, and copper in the north; and in the south there are diamonds. Namibia also has gold, silver, lithium, and natural gas. For most of the region’s history, only metal was of interest to the native tribes. These tribes lived and traded together more or less peacefully, each with their own particular way of living, wherever the land was fertile enough. The San were nomads, hunters and gatherers. The Damara hunted and worked copper. The Ovambo grew crops in the north, where there was more rain, but also worked in metal. The Nama and the Herero were livestock farmers, and they were the two main tribes in the 1840s when the Germans (first missionaries, then settlers, then soldiers) began arriving in South West Africa.
Before the Germans, only a few Europeans had visited it: explorers, traders and sailors. They opened up trade outlets for ivory and cattle; they also brought in firearms, with which they traded for Namib treasures. Later, big guns and European military systems were introduced. The tribes now settled their disputes with lethal violence: corruption of a peaceful culture was under way.
During The Berlin Conference Germany was awarded what is now called Namibia and settlers moved in, followed by a military governor who knew little about running a colony and nothing at all about Africa. Major Theodor Leutwein began by playing off the Nama and Herero tribes against each other. More and more white settlers arrived, pushing tribesmen off their cattle-grazing lands with bribes and unreliable deals. The Namib’s diamonds were discovered, attracting yet more incomers with a lust for wealth. Tribal cattle-farmers had other problems, too: a cattle-virus epidemic in the late 1890s killed much of their livestock. The colonists offered the Herero aid on credit. As a result the farmers amassed large debts, and when they couldn’t pay them off the colonists simply seized what cattle were left.In January 1904, the Herero, desperate to regain their livelihoods, rebelled. Under their leader Samuel Maherero they began to attack the numerous German outposts. They killed German men, but spared women, children, missionaries, and the English or Boer farmers whose support they didn’t want to lose. At the same time, the Nama chief, Hendrik Witbooi, wrote a letter to Theodor Leutwein, telling him what the native Africans thought of their invaders, who had taken their land, deprived them of their rights to pasture their animals on it, used up the scanty water supplies, and imposed alien laws and taxes. His hope was that Leutwein would recognise the injustice and do something about it.
The German Emperor replaced Major Leutwein with another commander, this time a man notorious for brutality who had already fiercely suppressed African resistance to German colonisation in East Africa. Lieutenant-General Lothar von Trotha said, ‘I wipe out rebellious tribes with streams of blood and streams of money. Only following this cleansing can something new emerge’. Von Trotha brought with him to German South West Africa 10,000 heavily-armed men and a plan for war. Under his command, the German troops slowly drove the Herero warriors to a position where they could be hemmed in by attack on three sides. The fourth side offered escape; but only into the killing wastes of the Kalahari desert. The German soldiers were paid well to pursue the Herero into this treacherous wilderness. They were also ordered to poison the few water-holes there. Others set up guard posts along a 150-mile border: any Herero trying to get back was killed.
On October 2, 1904, von Trotha issued his order to exterminate the Herero from the region. ‘All the Herero must leave the land. If they refuse, then I will force them to do it with the big guns. Any Herero found within German borders, with or without a gun, will be shot. No prisoners will be taken. This is my decision for the Herero people’.
After the Herero uprising had been systematically put down, by shooting or enforced slow death in the desert from starvation, thirst and disease (the fate of many women and children), those who still lived were rounded up, banned from owning land or cattle, and sent into labour camps to be the slaves of German settlers. Many more Herero died in the camps, of overwork, starvation and disease. By 1907, in the face of criticism both at home and abroad, von Trotha’s orders had been cancelled and he himself recalled, but it was too late for the crushed Herero. Before the uprising, the tribe numbered 300,000; after it, only 15,000 remained.
During the period of colonisation and oppression, many women were used as sex slaves. In the Herero work camps there were numerous children born to these abused women, and a man called Eugen Fischer, who was interested in genetics, came to the camps to study them; he carried out medical experiments on them as well. He decided that each mixed-race child was physically and mentally inferior to its German father (a conclusion for which there was and is no respectable scientific foundation whatever) and wrote a book promoting his ideas: ‘The Principles of Human Heredity and Race Hygiene’. Adolf Hitler read it while he was in prison in 1923, and cited it in his own infamous pursuit of ‘racial purity’.
The Nama suffered at the hands of the colonists too. After the defeat of the Herero the Nama also rebelled, but von Trotha and his troops quickly routed them. On April 22 1905 Lothar von Trotha sent his clear message to the Nama: they should surrender. ‘The Nama who chooses not to surrender and lets himself be seen in the German area will be shot, until all are exterminated. Those who, at the start of the rebellion, committed murder against whites or have commanded that whites be murdered have, by law, forfeited their lives. As for the few not defeated, it will fare with them as it fared with the Herero, who in their blindness also believed that they could make successful war against the powerful German Emperor and the great German people. I ask you, where are the Herero today?’ During the Nama uprising, half the tribe (over 80,000) were killed; the 9,000 or so left were confined in concentration camps.
From this it was a short step to advocating the racial supremacy of Aryans in Nazi Germany. Nazism was not an isolated instance of human infamy, then, but part of an earlier behaviour that went back to Imperial German Africa.
Hermann Göring’s father, Dr Heinrich Ernst Göring, served as the first Commissioner of German South West Africa, orchestrating that barbarity, before becoming the Kaiser’s ambassador to Haiti in 1893. The notorious brown shirts worn by the Nazi storm troopers had originally served as uniforms in Namibia.
Not long after Dr Göring had begun to confiscate Herero and Nama tribal lands, Berlin sanctioned the use of concentration camps. The most notorious of these, set up in 1905, was situated on Shark Island near the town of Lüderitz. The enormity of Shark Island has been suppressed and forgotten too long, say the authors. By the time the Konzentrationslager was closed in 1907, thousands had died there due to beatings and forced labour. Though the death toll is impossible to establish accurately (the Germans later burned incriminating documents), the liquidations were carried out so efficiently that by 1908 the Kaiser’s government had wrested a total of 46 million hectares of land from the Africans.
*The guards of the Namibian concentration camps also sold Herero skulls to German universities and private collectors.After the First World War, South West Africa was placed under the administration of South Africa. South Africa imposed its own system of apartheid (now banned in Namibia by law). In the late 1940s a guerrilla movement called SWAPO (South West African People’s Organisation) was founded to fight for independence. In 1968 the United Nations recognised the name Namibia, and the country’s right to independence, but it was another 20 years before South Africa agreed to withdraw and full independence was gained. By then the country was ravaged by war.Today most of Namibia’s 1.7m people are poor, living in crowded tribal areas while powerful and wealthy German ranchers still own millions of acres stolen by their predecessors over 100 years ago.Some of the descendants of the surviving Herero live in neighbouring Botswana, but others remained in their homeland and now make up 8% of Namibia’s population. Many of them are in the political opposition party. Most Herero men work as cattle-handlers on commercial farms. Although as opposition members they don’t get government support, the Herero on their own initiative recently asked Germany to give them compensation for the atrocities the tribe suffered, which the president of Germany recently acknowledged were ‘a burden on the conscience of every German’.The 25,000 or so present-day rich German settlers are among those who deny that there was a genocide, fearing that reparation might mean losing their valuable land.-by peace pledge union* Dr Ben always said europeans only use democracy and christianity when it suits their purpose.
This documentry is well worth watching: http://youtu.be/6oCxyFks4gY
This needs more awareness.
Yes. NEVER FORGET.
(via bankuei)
honestly i think it says a LOT about the effect of opium on china that i take more offense to the fact that she named her racist shitshow opium den than the fact that she’s profitting off of orientalised, fetishised, hypersexualised images of us with bonus yellowfacing
the first thing that pinged in my head was that she called it opium den cause i literally tossed my hands up with a giant Y UR RAYCISM SO OBVS
yeah
i took a look at the title and had to give myself a second to roll my eyes because hey look east asia being associated with opium —
- which white people introduced to china
- which white people waged a war over in order to continue breaking the qing government’s laws regarding the import of opium
- which white people grew in india for the specific purpose of shipment to china
— yet again.
white people love doing dirty shit to others and then associating them solely with that thing
that was their fault
in the fucking first place
“white people love doing dirty shit to others and then associating them solely with that thing”
“white people love doing dirty shit to others and then associating them solely with that thing”
“white people love doing dirty shit to others and then associating them solely with that thing”
in a nutshell.
(Source: yiheyuans)
Iroquois warrior scalping a white prisoner.
Fuck does this ever piss me off.
There were very few instances of scalping before the Europeans arrived. But then Europeans offered a bounty for the scalps of men, women and children. Most of the victims of scalping were native people, at the hands of Europeans who made money from doing this.
The idea that indigenous peoples engaged in this practice in any widespread manner pre-Contact is propaganda. This picture should show a white man scalping a native woman and her children for profit.
Wasn’t “scalping” learned from the French?
Yes. Yes it was.
White people lie about everything.
(via moniquill)
RACISM, HISTORY AND LIES: Some doctrines of racial supremacy as classically taught in Euro/American institutions, textbooks and media (via cosmicyoruba)
the missing pages of history is African/Black history
(via kemetically-ankhtified)
(Source: thefemaletyrant, via biyuti)
Ick factor high…cannibalism…among Europeans too.
Ewwwwwww….really?
Though Christian Europeans shunned the cannibalism of the New World, they themselves in fact practised cannibalism more systematically than any tribes in Canada or Brazil. Until around 1750, human fat, flesh, bone and blood (preferably drunk warm) were widely used and esteemed forms of medicine. Advocates and consumers included Francis Bacon, Robert Boyle and Charles II. Meanwhile, from the early sixteenth century, Protestants and Catholics in northern Europe denounced and slaughtered one another with tribal ferocity, even as each side attacked the ‘cannibal barbarity’ or inhumanity of the other. Frank Lestringant (1997) tells how, around 1580, a French Protestant was killed and eviscerated by Catholics. His heart was next ‘chopped in pieces, auctioned off, cooked on a grill and finally eaten with much enjoyment’.
Elsewhere such savagery might be inspired by social antagonisms. Historian Piero Camporesi (1988) tells of violent aristocratic feuds in early-modern Italy. In one case, a victim’s disembowelled heart was bitten. In a second, the narrator tells us, ‘lucky was the man who might grind the entrails between his teeth’. In a third instance, a man was tortured and killed before being disembowelled. After gnawing his intestines, his attackers proceeded to ‘cut him up into small pieces to remove his fat because he was young, being probably twenty-eight years of age, tall and slim in build’. In Camporesi’s view, the emphasis on the victim’s youth and stature betrays an intention to sell this fat to ‘pharmacologist-doctors’ who would find it ‘beneficial to all nervous ailments’. Given the trade in cannibalistic medicine, the inference looks all too plausible.
Um so it wasn’t just symbolic cannibalism eh Christians?
Wow. Amazing how these cultural practices never get discussed in the history books, hmmm?
How often was the charge of “cannibalism” used by europeans to slaughter and enslave indigenous peoples all over the place?
You know this reminds me of the song “Ota Mi” (in Yoruba means “My Enemies”).
The evil of our enemies may block the path but our stars shine the way through (crappy translation).
Not only was there cannibalism among Europeans, the idea of human sacrifice wasn’t so strange or gory to them either. Several years ago, someone left a comment on my blog about Africans and human sacrifice and how Europeans “civilised” us. I was so mad but this was the kind of person who wanted “real academic references” so I went to the university library and started reading up on Europe, Africa and human sacrifice.
The things I found. I’ve always wanted to write a post about it but was too lazy. Anyway the core of what I learnt was the when Europeans encountered those African ethnic groups that spoke of human sacrifice they were not shocked/surprised/repulsed because they had more gorier practices back home but when they needed reasons to justify their slaughter and enslavement of indigenous people, they started talking about things like cannibalism and human sacrifices while making themselves look like saints.
Finally, all of Europe’s dirty secrets will be revealed. I still can’t get over the fact that they did not know what soap was until the 18th century.
uh oh.
soap?
you went there?
uh oh!
‘A colonial or European education…annihilates a peoples belief in their names, in their languages, in their environment, in their heritage of struggle, in their unity, in their capacities and ultimately in themselves. It makes them see their past as one wasteland of non-achievement and it makes them want to distance themselves from that wasteland. It makes them want to identify with that which is furthest removed from themselves’ ~ Ngugi Wa Thiong’o, (Decolonising the Mind)
(via moniquill)